User talk:Ved varun

Welcome!

Hello, Ved varun, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hydroelectricity cell, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GILO A&E⇑ 17:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hydroelectricity cell

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hydroelectricity cell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 17:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Hydroelectricity cell, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jake Brockman (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hydroelectric cell

Hi there and welcome again to Wikipedia and thanks that you are contributing. I just wanted to let you know that articles should not be duplciated. THere is a disucssion about relevance of Hydroelectricity cell ongoing. There is no point creating an identical article as Hydroelectric cell. May I suggest to reinstate the redirect that was in place and wait for the new page review of the first article? Creation of duplicate articles will only lead to deletion of both and potential edit block. If you need any help or clarification, please let me know. Jake Brockman (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Template editor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jake Brockman (talk) 20:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Kindly check page i have created under user section with same name "hydroelectic cell" and give your valuable feedback. So that i can create its post in main pages. Also what is file extension used for wikimedia markup, I have been using .media and .mediawiki, both giving same results during pandoc conversion.

I will echo what Jake Brockman said below: The draft currently does not cite any references, the use of "our" and "we" indicates it might be original research (for which Wikipedia is not the appropriate venue) or even copy-pasted from elsewhere in violation of copyright, and the tone seems meant to promote hydroelectric cells. I have added a messagebox to the top of your draft that allows you to submit it for a review by an experienced editor, but if those issues are not addressed, the submission will not be accepted.

To my knowledge there is no "file extension" for the markup used by Wikipedia and other MediaWiki wikis. According to the Pandoc manual the parameter to be used to convert something into MediaWiki markup is -t mediawiki. Huon (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ved varun/Hydroelectric cell

Hi there. I just had a look at what you have on your user page as you had asked me to. A couple of observations: 1) the start to the article seems a bit steep. Maybe you should begin with a general description of that the hydroelectric cell is. Maybe look at the article for Solar cell as guidance. 2) claims that the cell is "safe", "clean" and "low cost", etc. will definitely require solid independent verification. If there is not peer reviewed confirmation of the same, I'd leave it out and stay on the descriptive level. 3) reviewers will be looking if the wording is neutral or comes across as promotional/marketing of own work. Avoid superlatives ("best", "breakthrough") and comparatives to other concepts ("more efficient than", "similar to") unless, again, this has verifiable peer reviewed third party backing. 4) check your wording. Somewhere I read "our " which seems to indicate you are involved in that research, which again would raise questions of neutrality. 5) make sure the article is own wording and not copied/previously published, otherwise this may get a copyright deletion. 6) last but most important: add references to each claim. The more references the better. Include a link to the published study and I think there are also a number of articles in popular scientistic and regular press. Those are always good to proof relevance. If a concept is not being talked about in the press over a period of time, it will fail the notability test. Finally, those are just my views and I am supportive of this getting an article after I have done some research on this. There will be other reviewers and admins who may think differently, so there is no guarantee. Jake Brockman (talk) 07:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Hydroelectric cell, from its old location at User:Ved varun/Hydroelectric cell. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 11:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hydroelectric cell (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Biochemistry&Love was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Written with misleading claims. It is my understanding that HECs do not "only use water" to generate electrical power. This smells a little bit pseudoscientific to me; at least, the reporting of it. Most of the reporting appears to be on the lead scientist's call for commercialization.

Claims like "Its usage would significantly reduce urban pollution" need to be well supported by reliable sources. There doesn't seem to be a great amount of reporting outside of India; it seems to me that an invention of this magnitude should be covered by major sources around the world.

Review of references: The article is mostly built on primary literature by authors Ravinder Kumar Kotnala and Jyoti Shah. References 1-18 are primary literature. Please refer to WP:PRIMARY.

World News (Wn.com): links to a YouTube video; not a reliable source. Science Examiner (sciexaminer.com): possibly a reliable source. Albeit, only reported on a press release. Energy News (energynews-ng.com): not a reliable source. Science World Report: seems to be a reliable source. The Hindu.com: seems to be a reliable source. Energy World (energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com): seems to be a reliable source.

Other notes: No obvious copyright violations, per Earwig's Copyvio Detector.

Please see MOS:CHEM for the "Working Principle of cell" section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hydroelectric cell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

―Biochemistry🙴❤ 21:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ved varun, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 21:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hydroelectric cell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hydroelectric cell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hydroelectric cell

Hello, Ved varun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hydroelectric cell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Hydroelectric cell

Draft:Hydroelectric cell, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Hydroelectric cell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Hydroelectric cell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hydroelectric cell has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hydroelectric cell. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hydroelectric cell (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The claim that energy is being obtained from the water is just incorrect, and Wikipedia should not be publishing incorrect science. (A chemist can see where the energy is really coming from, a reaction that isn't mentioned in the text at all.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hydroelectric cell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hydroelectric cell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hydroelectric cell has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hydroelectric cell. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ved varun! Your additions to National Physical Laboratory of India have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:11, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]