Jump to content

User talk:Vebyast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Vebyast! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!  7  08:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Only at Tech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  7  07:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From article talk page

[edit]

About the speedy deletion: so far, Only at Tech has been online for about 24 hours, and already has over 8000 unique pageviews (see http://www.onlyattech.net/view/Sports/480). There are about 550 posts as of right now. Note that this is from a student body of about 30000, graduates and undergraduates. There was no advertising of any form, just word of mouth and a few unofficial announcements by TAs. I figured that, if it actually did become a major feature in Georgia Tech culture, we'd want to start writing down exact details early. Vebyast (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A very promising start indeed - but see WP:WEB for the notability requirements for websites. Also - even if there is every hint that this site will be notable in the future, per this policy we don't usually list items in anticipation of them qualifying. An admin will review this and even if it does get deleted you've got a great start on the article here and you can keep it and work on it in your userpage while the site gets a little more in the way of a third-party list of sources which discuss the site.  7  07:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oct or Nov

[edit]

You mentioned the site has only been online for 24 hours, but you state that it started in October. Do you mean November?  7  09:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, yeah. Thanks for pointing that out. Also, looks like it's been deleted, kind of as I expected. Now we wait for references.