User talk:Vboskos

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Vboskos, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Kyklàda.press to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 20:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyklàda.press (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyklàda.press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PARAKANYAA and thanks for editing this! I am writing back to ask for some kind clarifications from your side. Could you please be more specific as to what revisions are necessary for the article to be valid for wikipedia? The draft currently has 3 independent sources that either review the imprint or interview with its members, namely The Avery Review, Printed Matters, and Archisearch. These three sources discuss the publishing initiative in depth (especially the Avery Review piece), and all of them (especially The Avery Review and Archisearch) are reliable, long-established sources in the fields of Arts, Architecture, and the Humanities. Would more sources of this kind be necessary? And if yes, how many? Or, does the problem lie with the references to kyklàda.press's own website? it is easy to remove those and the specific parts they refer to. Or is there something else I cannot think about? Thank you in advance! Vboskos (talk) 06:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]