User talk:Vborcan

Speedy deletion nomination of Wanguard

Hello Vborcan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wanguard for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Nomadpenguin (talk) 23:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrisoft WANGUARD

The article Andrisoft WANGUARD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, and can't find a single mention of it online in WP:Reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Captain Conundrum (talk) 10:28, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Andrisoft WANGUARD

Vborcan, thanks for creating Andrisoft WANGUARD!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page on Andrisoft WANGUARD needs more citations. The first 3 sections do not have any citations. It would be a good idea to provide citations from multiple sources. Thank You Editor

14:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC) The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Editor

14:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:WANGUARD 5 DDoS Attack.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WANGUARD 5 DDoS Attack.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]