User talk:Vb/Wallonia
Appearance
I am editing this page in order to improve the Wallonia article which requires a thorough rewriting. Vb (talk) 10:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've moved this page to the original author's namespace, so hopefully they can continue to edit there without risk of deletion (seeing as the only CSD was as a test page). Booglamay (talk) - 14:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Please don't mix everything
[edit]Dear José,
- Why do you begin history with industry? Please do me a favour: begin with prehistory.
- Why do you put "This industrial area was the breeding grounds of the European socialist movement." in geography. This should go to politics!
- Why do you put "In Rixensart, the company Recherche et Industrie Thérapeutiques (changed in GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals in 2000) is one of the world’s leading vaccine manufacturers, supplying around 25% of the world’s vaccines: GSK Biologicals employs a little over 5,300 persons on the Walloon sites of Rixensart, Wavre and Gembloux. The company distributes 36 doses of vaccines every second. [5]" in geography: this belongs to economics.
- Why do you put "The castle of Corroy-le-Château, one of the best conserved castles of this period in North Europe was bought by a Flemish artist Wim Delvoye for EUR 3.3 million. He is planning to convert the Corroy-le-Château into a museum of modern art.[6]" in geography? This belongs to culture. Etc...Vb10:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Why? It is very simple: because I am rewriting this whole article and what you red is simply mistakes of which I became so aware that I spoke to you about a new page History of Wallonia. I am aware too I must erase many things. Things which I must perhaps write on other pages. You are right but what you red is but draft page. Remember it, VB I am not able to do the best in one or two days, absolutely not... It is a work in progress far from perfect, very far...José Fontaine (talk) 23:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- OK That's the case for all of us. Nobody's perfect. However you should put your drafts directly at the right place, i.e. within the correct subsection/paragraph. I would like to help you editing. You must keep in mind you are not the only editor of this article and you must think about the other ones: they'd like to correct small mistakes but not change the whole structure and erase info of yours. Vb 08:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.253.191 (talk)
- OK.I agree with you. I think the original page on Wallonia itis possible to make of it a page on the History of Wallonia.But there ismuch work about this draft page. Thank you for your help, sincerely, José Fontaine (talk) 09:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- OK That's the case for all of us. Nobody's perfect. However you should put your drafts directly at the right place, i.e. within the correct subsection/paragraph. I would like to help you editing. You must keep in mind you are not the only editor of this article and you must think about the other ones: they'd like to correct small mistakes but not change the whole structure and erase info of yours. Vb 08:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.253.191 (talk)