User talk:Vaza12
Agreed
[edit]Ok, I agree. Thanks for being somewhat reasonable. Can you help in construction a page for Ganesha dynasty? Since you want to take the individuals out, you might want to put it back by creating a page with dynasty. Cheers (2600:1001:B12A:7F40:7497:4CF5:F10D:28CD (talk) 20:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC))
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bengali Muslims
- added links pointing to Dravidian, Indo-Aryan, Awami Muslim League and Arakan
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 22 August
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Mukti Bahini page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Osmani and Ouderland.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Osmani and Ouderland.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 21:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. As you did here. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 21:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- @TripWire: You accused me of stuff as well. Let it go, please. There is nothing to be gained from undermining these articles. I am on Wikpedia to create notable content. I try my best to avoid controversy in South Asia pages.--Vaza12 (talk) 21:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- You should avoid attacking other editors basing your misconceived belief about their nationality. You have no idea who I am. For the record, instead of patronizing me, please see to the queries being raised regarding your contentious and POV edits and address them at the respective talkpages. Also, WP takes copyrights very seriously and as an editor, I take it as my duty to see WP's policies are upheld at all times. There's nothing personal here as you are repeatedly trying to imply.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 21:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- @TripWire: You accused me of stuff as well. Let it go, please. There is nothing to be gained from undermining these articles. I am on Wikpedia to create notable content. I try my best to avoid controversy in South Asia pages.--Vaza12 (talk) 21:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:1971 Bangladesh refugees.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:1971 Bangladesh refugees.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 21:49, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Homecoming.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Homecoming.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 21:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mukti Bahini.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Mukti Bahini.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡ ʞlɐʇ 21:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bangladesh
- added a link pointing to Nuclear energy
- List of medieval great powers
- added a link pointing to Turkic
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Bengali Muslims
[edit] | Hello, Vaza12. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Bengali Muslims at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! – Corinne (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, Vaza12 -- I enjoyed reading this article. It was fairly well written as it was; you'll see that I made several small copy-edits. I have some questions. I'll post them on the article's talk page. I look forward to your answers and ideas. – Corinne (talk) 01:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Citations
[edit]Hi Vaza, please be sure to give full citations to books and articles you cite. The Citation tool in the template below gives you an easy way to make them. More information in the template below Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
@Kautilya3: I did give full citations earlier.
Edit warring on Mukti Bahini
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Mukti Bahini shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
When you find your addition being reverted, engage with the other editor or take your dispute to a WP:DR venue. Engaging in an edit war is not a good way to go about the editing process.--regentspark (comment) 19:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- @RegentsPark: I've been incredibly patient. I reverted only twice today. And I've discussed on the talk page.--Vaza12 (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Just keep in mind that WP:BRD suggests discussing sooner rather than later. Also, edit warring doesn't have to be at 3RR so be careful. --regentspark (comment) 19:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
SPI notice
[edit]
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bazaan. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Bazaan (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. regentspark (comment) 19:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Vaza12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)