User talk:Vaudeville Duo

Welcome!

Hello, Vaudeville Duo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Six Impala, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Six Impala

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Six Impala, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Six Impala (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Six Impala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vaudeville Duo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaudeville Duo this draft is also written in a completely inappropriate tone. I have not marked it for speedy deletion for spam, but other editors might. qcne (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I will do what I can to fix this article. Vaudeville Duo (talk) 11:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a read of our policy at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. qcne (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote this on the Teahouse but no response yet. Thought I would post it here in case you can tell me whether or not I should keep trying to publish this article: “ Hello there! I like a band I discovered via Spotify. They are called Six Impala. They have 47.8k listeners so they’re not tiny but I feel they should be better known. One of their members is called underscores and they have 361.8k listeners. I do not know them personally and live on the other side of the planet. They have not been written about much so maybe that means they are not worthy of entry? Please advise! (Also, my draft was rejected because the tone is inappropriate so I will work to fix that if they are allowed to be included.)” Vaudeville Duo (talk) 11:47, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I read the policy and deleted the glowing praise. Vaudeville Duo (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Vaudeville Duo, I see you got responded to on the Teahouse- but just to re-iterate we're looking for significant coverage in multiple independent sources: so not interviews. Reviews would work, like ref 2, but your other references don't. We're usually looking for at least three of these types of sources. qcne (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Vaudeville Duo! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Unsure if I Should Continue to Try…, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 04:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]