User talk:Vasdacarrrc
October 2014
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Vasdacarrrc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
iam editing the page to keep it updated.....and becazz iam doing that ur blocking yust becazz i posted a relevant link??? How stupid is that? Vasdacarrrc (talk) 10:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 11:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|what are u talking about!!!??? I place a link from Vsauce!!!! becazz the page is telling something about Vsauce.... so if there is a artciale about CNN and i place a link like www.cnn.com that is wrong? But that page belong to cnn so its a refernce .....and u block me for that? How stupid is that? Vasdacarrrc (talk) 13:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)}}