User talk:VarmtheHawk

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, VarmtheHawk. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Montanabw ^(talk) 00:26, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello VarmtheHawk, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to James White Cloud has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:VarmtheHawk reported by User:ItsKesha (Result: ). Thank you. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VarmtheHawk. In the above noticeboard, you have said The complainer and their collaborator saw fit to change the article repeatedly without coordination. "Collaborator" appears to refer to myself. This is false and I ask you to withdraw this. I also ask you to self-revert your most recent revert on List of chess grandmasters. Thank you. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:49, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of chess grandmasters

Hello VarmtheHawk. You've been warned for edit warring per the result of a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article size activists

Looking at the editing history I see what you mean. There's a small coterie of "article split activist" editors who prowl around looking for large articles in areas where they have no subject expertise and splitting them up. They don't seem to realise that people aren't using Pentium 4 PCs and dial-ups anymore. They will WP:BLUDGEON away until you give in. First it was links to player profiles on the sport's governing body's page, then it was birth places, then it was name formats, then it was numbering, then it was splitting into living and dead players. Of course none of them know anything about chess or chess culture, they even speculated that there are a whole lot of deaths that haven't been noted (there are not). MaxBrowne2 (talk) 18:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use of external link in citations on Cave de Sueth etc

Following your request for others involvment on Talk:Cave de Sueth#Link removal, I've asked for an opinion at Wikipedia:External_links/Noticeboard#Erenow.net. You may find pings in your notifications. GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]