User talk:Varadhanskm
I removed some malicious content that seemed to insinuate that vadakalai iyengars are Brahmins and thenkalai iyengars are not. Since this is far from truth, making such negative statements in a public place such as wikipedia is not acceptable. Hence I removed it. I will continue to watch this page for any such attempt to spread contempt and ill-will. Thanks.
Welcome!
Hello, Varadhanskm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Iyengar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Filing Flunky (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Iyengar, you may be blocked from editing. Hari7478 (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
3RR
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. AlexiusHoratius 21:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)