User talk:Vanteloop

Hi vanteloop

Hi there, I was wondering why your most edited wiki page was Autopoises? Just was in a wiki wormhole and stumbled upon your profile

/Bam 2600:6C60:0:B9:B829:F4A2:B5FD:1927 (talk) 04:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for the question :) Most of the time when I'm editing, I will read or see something interesting in a reliable source and add it to the page. I was reading about autopoises recently in a non-scientific context and I found it interesting so read up some more on it, and added a little to the wikipedia page as well as cleaning it up a little Vanteloop (talk) 10:04, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC comments

You collapsed my comment on your comment, and I reverted you. First, I am not commenting on user's votes (the posts that start with "Yes"/"No"), because I believe users must comment only once. However, you took liberty to make two posts (one was a vote, and another was a comment). If you have a right to make additional comments, then other users have a right to comment on it. If you don't think other users can do that, then you cannot make comments either. Otherwise, your approach is just unfair. You can easily resolve this problem by moving ALL three comments (including yours 21:24, 20 December 2021 comment) to the back-and-forth discussion. In addition, I've noticed that your user page contains a claim that "your proposal for a neutral RfC was used to determine the articles future". Not only that is not modest, that is just false. It is up to you, but if I were you, I would feel uncomfortable when my user page contained false claims. Paul Siebert (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've just realised that you didn't vote for/against C. Then everything was fine. If you do not plan to vote (to make additional posts), feel free to remove my post completely (or collapse it).

Again, if you are not going to vote in this section, I am bringing my apologies and respectfully ask you to delete/collapse my post.

Best.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything after the first sentence of this message is wrong, it's quite impressive really. Vanteloop (talk) 09:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MKuCR RFC

Any reason why you haven't participated in the RFC yet? All the other participants in the DR process have. --Nug (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey , yeah I need to get round to it. I've been reading others comments but haven't had the time to properly consider them all yet. I'll probably do it today. Kind regards Vanteloop (talk) 20:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]