User talk:Vanished user sdvij23rkng6085juioerjgoiwneri3j4t8hegin4g

Shell Shock

When you add references to an article, please "cover" the URLs with a description rather than posting a long string of URL text.....

If you follow the example of two which I created yesterday - e.g.

<r e f> Robert-Jan Bartunek, "Shell Shock opera brings trauma of World War One to stage" on reuters.com < / r e f > spacing add in "ref" to allow this to be seen here

you will see that URL string plus article title, beginning with "http" and ending with "stage", is covered with an opening and closing square bracket [ and then ]. In that way, it creates a link to the article and supplies the article's title.

Thanks for improving this opera article. Viva-Verdi (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does this reference relate to the first quotation or to the second?

(N. Lens in La Monnaie Magazine Publications Sept. 2014)

Image tagging for File:Shell Shock -opera.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shell Shock -opera.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Slow Man -poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Slow Man -poster.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Slow Man -poster.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Slow Man -poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 15:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Shell Shock -opera.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shell Shock -opera.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 15:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Terra Terra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shell Shock (opera)

Please do not delete or edit the legitimate talk page comments of other editors. Voceditenore (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why not? I f I did read and it has been adapted why should it stay? Like a life long scholish punishment or something to remind you of 'what you did dare to do wrong'? We are not in the communist era of Mao Tsé Tung, are we?

Why not? Because article talk pages are for the benefit of all editors and are meant as a record of notable changes to and discussions about the article. When copyright violations are removed from an article, a permanent record is kept on the talk page. You are nowhere mentioned in that notice. And while I'm here I want to remind you that if you have any affiliation whatsoever with Nicolas Lens, either personal or professional, you need to read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and follow them scrupulously. Voceditenore (talk) 10:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As said before on this page we made contributions to the website of the subject you mentioned (your spelling is wrong) but also we created the sites and contributions to Wiki of more than 10 other subjects from which we (admitted) are fans and in which we have a special interest (we are a student group at the university). Indeed, if you believe that there are ‘conflicts of interest’, please feel free to show and report them, instead of stating a severe but unnecessary warning. Because now it looks too much as you are enjoying your given authority, Mr Voceditenore. And this one day might kill the fun of doing what we are doing.

You can just call me Voceditenore. Apart from the unnecessary sarcastic tone it conveys, I am a woman and "Mr." does not apply. There is no need to take such an aggressive stance with editors who disagree with you or point out problems with your editing. Ditto here and here. I suggested that you read the guidance on conflict of interest because it invariably affects one's editing and you need to be wary of the pitfalls, especially a tendency to promotionalism which is evident in some of your articles and has been noticed and removed by several other editors as you are well aware. Finally, you keep referring to "we". I hope this does not mean that this account and its password are shared by two or more editors. Shared accounts are not permitted on Wikipedia. Voceditenore (talk) 12:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]