Jump to content

User talk:Vanished user sdfkdknmaei8r5u9jd8h3wknsdcviun4t

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: David Reimer (January 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Palm Village, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Palm Village", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent an organisation (Palm Village Retirement Community), rather than an individual, see WP:CORPNAME. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. - You also need to read about conflict of interest and paid editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse reply

[edit]
Hello, Vanished user sdfkdknmaei8r5u9jd8h3wknsdcviun4t. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

January 2016

[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 21:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]