User talk:Vanimurarka

Welcome!

Hello, Vanimurarka, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 22:43, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vinod Tewary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vinod Tewary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have created a new version of this page that was deleted in September. It is not CV-like now, and all promotion language has been removed. How can I submit this new page? Please advise.

I know this scientist, and I know that he has done significant work in the field of nanomaterials research over his lifetime. Addition of his details to Wikipedia would make Wikipedia's coverage of nanomaterials research that much more complete -- hence I want to try again.

The Wikipedia user linked in the re-creation of this page "Athaenara" is a different from you "Pickledicae" and I cannot make out how to contact Athaenara. That is an additional confusion.

I hope you can help me out. I can submit the re-worked page for review first, if required.

Thank you. Vanimurarka (talk) 04:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is what the re-creation page gives in semi-red:

A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.

12:53, 9 September 2022 Athaenara talk contribs deleted page Vinod Tewary (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: résumé-type spam, more at User talk:Vanimurarka) (thank)

Vanimurarka (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Tewary moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vinod Tewary, is not suitable as written to remain published. As you have a conflict of interest, you should submit it through the Articles for Creation process. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just so you know, Athaenara has been indefinetly blocked following an incident, so you're unlikely to get any answers from them if you have/decide to contact them. You could try asking any questions at the Teahouse, or just see what feedback you get from the article you have created.

Also, I have moved your article to the draft area so you can submit it to the Articles for Creation process. Although not strictly required, you should do it if you have a conflict of interest. Just hit submit at the top of the article.

Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you. I don't really think there's a conflict of interest here. Our collaboration is in a totally unrelated field from the subject's main work and contribution to the world. It's just that I know enough about this subject's work to create an article and felt it would be a good addition to Wikipedia. I would learn how to add content to Wikipedia in the process so that I may then work on other matter that I want to contribute to Wikipedia.

Nevertheless, I appreciate your feedback and action. I will go through the links you have suggested and work further as appropriate. Once again, thank you. :-) Vanimurarka (talk) 03:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinod Tewary (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still reads like a resume and I fail to see any non-primary sources being included. That being said on a cursory BEFORE search I do see a h-index above 20 on Google Scholar which might pass our guidelines for notability of researchers :)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinod Tewary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 07:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Vanimurarka (talk) 07:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vanimurarka! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 07:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vinod Tewary has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vinod Tewary. Thanks! Sohom (talk) 07:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinod Tewary (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately the awards from ICCES do not qualify to pass the notability criteria of WP:NPROF. (At NIST he is effectively an academic who does not teach.) The ICCES is a fairly small conference, not a major one such as APS. Being elected a fellow of APS plus some other large awards are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinod Tewary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 16:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vinod Tewary

Hello, Vanimurarka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vinod Tewary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]