User talk:Vanda0201

April 2013

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Kinu. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 00:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously the warnings are to never be taking seriously Vanda0201 (talk) 00:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dunfermline Athletic F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 00:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vanda

Vanda is back! And better than ever! The man who was unlawfully blocked before HAS returned. Just Bring it! Vanda doesn't do walking away!

admin

as you can see above me, abuse off admins as per usual

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanda0201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was i blocked? Vandalism they say? I have only edited ONE article, yes ONE! and it was something i thought would improve the article. by the way it was only ONE word i used. Clearly there is a vendetta against me

Decline reason:

WP:DENY. Kinu ^t/_c 02:30, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.