User talk:VanceJordan

VanceJordan, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi VanceJordan!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Nicholson (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

First off, congratulations on a solid start and please keep going. The history section is very light on references and for a bio of a living person we have a high standard for referencing. Basically, anything that you write needs a source. Could you also review the sources you have used so it is clearer to other editors who wish to verify sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Nicholson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 06:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flat Out-

Hello. Thank you for the feedback on the Jeff Nicholson page. I am looking into making the suggested changes to the page. While I do that, I wanted to show you the old version of the page- it has been significantly revised already, I'm not sure if you were able to check it out.

Here's a link: http://deletionpedia.org/en/Jeff_Nicholson

Thank you for your time, Vance VanceJordan (talk) 01:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! VanceJordan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Flat Out (talk) 06:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Nicholson (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Nicholson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeff Nicholson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeff Nicholson. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flat Out- Hello- Thank you for your recent (and original) feedback, it made things clearer for me. I figured out how to put the web links right in the footnote section rather than duplicated in the external links section. That looks much cleaner, thanks. I think that and your original request for more references is covered (virtually every statement has a reference now). The other editor who declined it said it needed more verifiable news sources and less interviews. I would like to point out that most of the history referred to here is pre-internet, so it only seems logical that my seven news print references outnumbers my few web news references. With 20 references for five paragraphs, I think this is really solid article when I compare it to other similar wiki articles. Do you agree and can you release it now? Thank you for your time.

VanceJordan (talk) 23:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeff Nicholson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeff Nicholson. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 02:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Nicholson (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Nicholson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 04:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Nicholson has been accepted

Jeff Nicholson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Flat Out (talk) 02:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]