User talk:Valter.wolf

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 15:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nimrod, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly haven't read the article as you seem to think you are reverting the idea of some writer. The WP:LEAD summarises the article, and these possible identifications are well sourced from multiple authors. Doug Weller talk 15:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reverted by 3 editors, it's time to stop deleting and use the talk page

Further deletion is likely to get you blocked. Doug Weller talk 12:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to what you wrote on my talk page, the above isn't a threat, it's a warning about cause and effect. But thanks for using the talk page. Doug Weller talk 07:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Josephus isn't a reliable source for Nimrod

Besides not being a contemporary, we treat him as a primary source. Our articles should in the main be based on reliably published secondary sources. See WP:Verify and WP:RS. If you think the sources we are using fail our criteria you can go to WP:RSN. Doug Weller talk 17:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nimrod again, pls remove the misleading info

Hey, you are not really using any sources for that paragraph, you took that from your guts. Those "editors" that message me also failed to give any source for their claim in the article. It sounded to me more like their opinion than actual historical data. So no one can state that Nimrod is any kind of "conflation". On the country, even Britannica says that there is a resemblance between Nimron and Gilgamesh (see links belos). Further, if Joshephus is "not a reliable source" then neither are you at all, so that misleading piece of information you added should be definitively removed!

Some links:

"There is a resemblance between Nimron and Gilgamesh" https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nimrod

"What Josephus says here is precisely what is found in the Gilgamesh epics" http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2006/10/30/Who-Was-Nimrod.aspx

"Identifying Nimrod of Genesis 10 with Sargon of Akkad by Exegetical and Archaeological Means" https://www.academia.edu/2184113/_2013_Identifying_Nimrod_of_Genesis_10_with_Sargon_of_Akkad_by_Exegetical_and_Archaeological_Means

Etc... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valter.wolf (talk • contribs) 01:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who posted this, but alright--"resemblance" isn't much, and the other two are not reliable sources. (Do you know what Academia is?) Drmies (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Drmies: that was written by this editor. He's posted to Talk:Nimrod now. He's posted to my talk page saying I threatened him and confusingly saying something about not being able to associate Nimrod with a historical figure, despite the fact that the Creationist he cites in the last link above says Nimrod was Sargon. Doug Weller talk 07:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]