User talk:Valliappan Kannappan

Welcome!

Hi Valliappan Kannappan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getnlemen,

Thank you for welcoming. The tutorial was very helpful. Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chiral drugs and related articles

Hi Valliappan Kannappan.

I noticed your query at the Teahouse and as a result took a look at your new article about chiral drugs. I found it well written and useful, although I may make a few tweaks of my own to it. One comment: almost all drugs are chiral and your article focuses, quite reasonably, on those that have eutomers and distomers. This leads to a problem of scope and of the article's title. It is really only about a subset of all possible drugs, especially those used as racemates and where the distomer had an unwanted effect. I'm not sure what a better title for the article would be but maybe you would like to think of one?

On another topic, members of the WP:WikiProject Chemistry have recently been trying to clean up important articles that need expert attention. One of these is Stereocenter which currently is quite poor (see article and its talk page). Would you be interested in taking it on for improvement, given it is clearly in your area of expertise?

If you have anything you want to ask me about, please just comment back here: I'll be watching this page for a while. Welcome to the community of editors! Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike Turnbull,

Thanks for your compliment and observations about my article on chiral drugs. Regarding the title I thought it is appropriate. But as now you have a different view point let me think from your angle. Regarding working on the article Stereocenter let me go through the article and get back to you. Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 14:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Valliappan Kannappan:, I just wanted to say how much I appreciated your article on chiral separation. Important subject, treated thoroughly, a nice article. Elemimele (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elemimele,

Thank you so much. You liked the article on "Chiral drugs". Today I have moved an article on "Chiral analysis". You may visit the talk page and make your observations. Another article that might interest you is on "Chiral switch". It is already there. Take a look when you find time. Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Valliappan Kannappan! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Penicillamine image

Hi Valliappan

I note that you nominated your file "Penicillamine enantiomers.png" for deletion. As far as I can tell, there was no need to do that as you uploaded a corrected version to Commons, overwriting the incorrect version. When that happens, it is not necessary to delete version 1 and I have commented on the deletion discussion page to say so. The naming of penicillamine isomers is a bit tricky because of sulfur taking priority in CIP conventions but as far as I can see you have got it fully correct now! Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mike, Thanks for the response. In fact I nominated the file "Penicillamine enantiomers.png" for deletion thinking the incorrect version need to be removed. Otherwise it is fine and no need to delete. Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure of the correct way to stop the deletion discussion but my comment there should be enough to stop any administrator from doing it, especially if you now add a comment withdrawing your request. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I withdraw my request for nomination of the file "Penicillamine enantiomers.png" for deletion. Trust this would suffice the purpose.Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes — but you have to make that edit on the page Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penicillamine enantiomers.png, not here! Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I got it wrong. I have already made the withdrawal request on the page Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penicillamine enantiomers.png Valliappan Kannappan (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethambutol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meso. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Levolet

Hello there! My mother asked me whether Levolet is a trade name of Levofloxacin or not. I'm not well-versed in terms of medicine, so I'm asking you right this minute. I googled "trade names of Levofloxacin", and I opened medinda. com (or org. In a word, I don't remember exactly), so, according to the afore-mentioned site, Levolet is a trade name of Levofloxacin. I don't know whether medinda is a liable source. Could you recommend me a good source which deals with the trade names of Levofloxacin?

P. S. Anyway, could you add this trade name in the article on Levofloxacin? Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 10:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Unichiral" article

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Unichiral, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Unichiral where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ~~

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unichiral (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seawolf35 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unichiral and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seawolf35 ^T--C 17:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Valliappan Kannappan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seawolf35 ^T--C 17:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Unichiral

Hello, Valliappan Kannappan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Unichiral".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]