User talk:Valarkho

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Valarkho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of a user named Dzurdzuketi. Why am I being linked to this user? Please unblock my profile.--Valarkho (talk) 04:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dzurdzuketi. Please address your links to Akkadian99 and Akkadian7. Yamla (talk) 13:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla It states that the "connection of these editors with Dzurdzuketi is only on behavior". Why was I not tagged in this investigation, so that I could defend myself? User named 'Dzurdzuketi' was accused of not seeking consensus with other users on the Ingush people article, I, however did seek consensus, as you can see on the talk page (link1 and also in edit history tab (link2. Also, my edits and IP adress differ from user Dzurdzuketi's. Why was I immediately blocked, should I not receive a notification of a warning first? I was not even aware that I was linked to various sock puppets. --Valarkho (talk) 22:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have the opportunity to defend yourself now. I note that you haven't addressed the links to either of the accounts I mentioned. You need to do so. --Yamla (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla, I've carefully read the case, and it states that these other 2 have supposedly show the same behavior as me. But I've checked Akkadian99 and Akkadian7 user' contributions, they differ from mine. (link1) and ([[1]]). Akkadian99 was reported for not resolving matters and not seeking consensus (see here) While I am pro-discussion and argumenting evry edit, and even suggested resolving topics with user's with an opposing opinion. As you can tell by my activity in this article: Edit history). --Valarkho (talk) 03:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed sockpuppetry with Akkadian7 and Akkadian99. As you are not addressing this, this is the end of the line. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 10:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, how bout you eat sh*t then? Sounds fair to me. --Valarkho (talk) 03:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]