User talk:Vakarel

Speedy deletion of Blåbärskullen transmitter

A tag has been placed on Blåbärskullen transmitter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mhsb (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Electric power transmission systems

There is a discussion, which articles should be included in the category:Electric power transmission systems. Your opinion is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion for Red Sea Cable

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Sea Cable

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Red Sea Cable, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fevrret (talk) 00:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Facility 4101, Tower 93

The article Facility 4101, Tower 93 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article, translation of de:Anlage 4101, Mast 93. Looking for either title gives no results in reliable sources, so this tower seems to lack notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the article, as is done by rote for contested proposed deletion. But unless you add sources for the information from reliable, 3rd party publishers, it'll probably get re-deleted. Cheers, Wily D 05:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Facility 4101, Tower 93 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Facility 4101, Tower 93 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facility 4101, Tower 93 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hilpertsau-Weisenbach compact overhead line for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilpertsau-Weisenbach compact overhead line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilpertsau-Weisenbach compact overhead line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jintang-Cezi Overhead Powerline Link moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jintang-Cezi Overhead Powerline Link, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wusung Radio Tower for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wusung Radio Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wusung Radio Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Njzjz (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please stop moving pages

Please stop moving draft articles to mainspace - especially as they are almost entirely unsourced. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ameren UE Tower moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Ameren UE Tower. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 04:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ameren UE Tower

Hello, Vakarel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ameren UE Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ameren UE Tower

Hello, Vakarel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ameren UE Tower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]