User talk:Vajrayudhan

Welcome!

Hello, Vajrayudhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 02:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gurbux Singh Grewal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gurbux Singh Grewal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vajrayudhan. Thank you for your work on Hari Singh Thapa. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!👍

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 14:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vajrayudhan. Thank you for your work on Rajinder Singh Sr.. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I am marking it reviewed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurbux Singh Grewal (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurbux Singh Grewal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vajrayudhan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using live rating on chess pages

I see you constantly update chess players pages with live ratings. Do not do that. Live ratings are not official and have no place on wikipedia. If you continue to add live ratings I will have to report you. Please learn the rules for chess article on wikipedia works before making edits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chess

"Unofficial live chess ratings, such as those published by the site 2700chess.com and unofficial historical ratings such as those published by the sites chessmetrics.com and edochess.ca are considered self-published and should not be included in a player's Infobox. They are not normally mentioned in articles, as this is potentially undue weight." Bugfingers (talk) 03:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have NEVER added live ratings for any chess player on Wikipedia. Please do not make unfounded accusations against me. I am well aware of the convention regarding Wikipedia articles. Vajrayudhan (talk) 03:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]