User talk:Vaibhavmit

"Deshastha as mentioned elsewhere in the article are Indo-Aryan. Appearance wise, they are similar to other communities in Maharashtra. H.H. Risley's work during the 1901 census [1] found Deshastha to be indistinguishable from most other castes like Maratha or Koli in Maharashtra.[3]"

This is a scholarly work cited by a number of authors during the last century. Genetic work also supports Risley's work that most castes of Maharashtra are very similar to each other. The same applies, for example, to Brahmins of Bengal. They are similar to other bengalis rather than brahmins of other region.

"Baji Prabhu Deshpande and Bal Thackeray are the noted historic and contemporary members of this community respectively"

Why do you think it was necessary to delete this sentence from Marathi people? sorry for this removal.

thank you.

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Rahul dravid.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Rahul dravid.jpg. The copy called Image:Rahul dravid.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 05:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Anjali vedpathahk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anjali vedpathahk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MJ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MJ.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:CMJoshiManohar.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:MJ1.jpg. The copy called Image:MJ1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 08:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anjali Vedpathak.

Are you sure she is deshastha and not daivadnya brahmin (sonar) ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.187.26.104 (talk) 16:40, August 20, 2007 (UTC) --ya i am sure abt this information also her Husband's Name is Bhagwat. which prooves the fact that she is Deshastha

Image tagging for Image:Mahajan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mahajan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Current IND Crick cpatain.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Current IND Crick cpatain.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

this image is:

This work of art is distributed under the Free Art License. You are free to redistribute it and/or modify it according to terms of this license.

ArtLibre.org

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 11:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MHMOUNTAIN1.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MHMOUNTAIN1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ROHIDA FORT.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ROHIDA FORT.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Speaker joshi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Speaker joshi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Rajguru.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajguru.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU≈talk 14:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bapuji Mudgal Deshpande

A tag has been placed on Bapuji Mudgal Deshpande requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Axmann8 (Talk) 07:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chimanaji Deshpande

The article Chimanaji Deshpande has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, and tagged as such, since 2009. An IP removed most of the text, unexplained, in Feb 2013: I've restored that text, but if nothing about this person can be sourced he should not be in the encyclopedia. A quick Google search finds nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 16:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]