User talk:VaderZeus

Infobox

I need help with making an infobox to organize that mess of userboxes I have on my page. Any takers?

VaderZeus (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never Mind

Never mind. I made one myself, but it was not an easy task. :-) VaderZeus (talk) 21:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gigogag for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 20:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VaderZeus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had heard that the PACE school article was part of a project on schools in Florida, so I decided to help out to improve the articles starting with this one. Thus, I have no connection to the sock you guys associate me with.

Decline reason:

The evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gigogag/Archive#25 August 2010 is too convincing. Favonian (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VaderZeus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am terribly sorry for all of the lies, bitter personal attacks, and abusive editing that I have done as Gigogag and my sockpuppets. I solemnly promise to assist you in repairing the damage I have done to Wikipedia. So please unblock me so I can make constructive edits for once and quit with the stupid sockpuppet business.

Decline reason:

This has been going on since 2009, with more then 20 sockpuppets being created by you. You claimed yesterday that you were completely uninvolved with any sockpuppets, and now you claim you in fact are. I'm sorry, but i see no reason why i should you believe your current claim. If you are sincere i would point to the standard offer, but seeing the length of this sock puppetry i'd say that a year is a more reasonable "No editing" term. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gigogag, you have potential to be a good editor on Wikipedia. Please take up the standard offer and don't sockpuppet for six months (I disagree with a year without editing). Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excirial, the reason why I was in denial with my first unblock post was because I thought at first I could get unblocked by lying that I am not a sock. I told the truth in the second message :-) VaderZeus (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Eagles247. VaderZeus (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to be turning your sockpuppeting around, can you tell us any other sockpuppets not listed here or here? Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, the accounts covered in those lists are my sockpuppets. In other words, I have not created any other accounts than the ones listed. VaderZeus (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So User:Abadaba123456789 was the first account you created? Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:32, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. User:Abadaba123456789 was the first account that I created, but I forgot the account's password not long after, so then I created that other one. VaderZeus (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I asked is because when you first created the userpage for Terranovia360 (here), it said "I am Terranovia360, a Wikipedian since August of 2009." However, you created Abadaba123456789, Gigogag, Terranovia360 and Ipownfroobs in October 2009. Did you create an account in August 2009? Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I know of. I must have put in the wrong month for when I created that account. VaderZeus (talk) 00:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Standard Offer

I'll go with the standard offer. See me back editing constructively in six months, Wikipedia! I'll miss being part of the action, but its worth waiting out the block. VaderZeus (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You never answered my question above. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I said August of 2009, I meant the date I started editing on Wikipedia as an IP User before I got those accounts. VaderZeus (talk) 19:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Edits

I tried to unblock the gigogag account by emailing the address User:MuZemike gave me, which was ever so nice of him, but for some reason my email provider Gmail sent me a message saying that email address unblock-en-I@wikimedia.org does not exist, and I had copied and pasted to be sure I'd get it right. Could anyone please contact MuZemike and tell him that I could not send my unblock email because of the reason above. Oh, and if he chooses to unblock, tell him to unblock Gigogag. Thank you very much :-) VaderZeus (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The email address you should use is unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Also, it has only been one month since you promised not to sock for six months. I have contacted MuZemike to inform him of this message, and he will decide what to do. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the email address. VaderZeus (talk) 19:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clongkobong's not my sock

I looked at Clongkobong's user page, talk page, and contributions and I have one problem about that account's inclusion in the "suspected sockpuppets of Gigogag" page: Clongkobong is not one of my socks. I had no knowledge whatsoever of the page he got busted for creating, fart mcnugget, until I saw his talk page, which means I have absolutely no connection with him unless we temporarily had similar IPs or something far-fetched like that. VaderZeus (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason Clongkobong was suspected as your sockpuppet was because they created the page Uber pownage, note the similar spelling of "pown" as one of your socks, User:Ipownfroobs. The user used the account for vandalism only, so don't feel guilty for their block. I'm going to remove the tag from their userpage now. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Standard Offer

The six months since you agreed to Wikipedia's standard offer have passed. If you are still willing to contribute here constructively, please let me know here. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]