User talk:V sq

Proposed deletion of Costly state verification

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Costly state verification, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

just a dicdef

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG (talk) 05:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: CSV article deleted

Thank you for the message you left on my talk page [1]. The Costly state verification (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article was deleted as an uncontested prod. As presented, the article did not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline, which is the threshold for inclusion. If you would like to take a crack at improving the article so that it does meet our notability guideline, I would be glad to un-delete and userfy the article for you. Just leave me a note on my talk page if that is what you want me to do. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 19:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)