User talk:VTCofC

Welcome!

Hello, VTCofC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Buster Seven Talk 21:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of ISAF installations in Afghanistan

Good Evening

On the List of ISAF installations in Afghanistan article please do not link every instance of the unit the first couple mentions are fine but no more. WP:Overlink says "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead."

Please do not change U.S. Army to USA in the forces column it's misleading and I doubt very much when someone thinks about the USA they are thinking about the army not the country.

Gavbadger (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening, sorry about the change to your sandbox but Wikipedia does not allow categories in sandboxes but you can still click on them to see the actual category.

In the actual List of ISAF installations in Afghanistan article as we sorting the installations in their tables by TYPE and alphabetically or by something else? Gavbadger (talk) 23:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gavbadger(talk)

Good evening to you as well.

No worries, I had just copied 100% of the live list into the sandbox to tweak it without messing up the original in the process. I can now clean up the ol' sandbox it looks like - I think we have this page looking quite nice. I'll keep digging for links and filling stuff in. Thanks for letting me add to your article and great thanks for the help! Cheers!

VTCofC (talk) 23:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, by the way no-one on Wikipedia can own an article it's against the Wikipedia Core policies to do as such, I merely merged together several installations from numerous pages into one article, also we need to decide on the width of the tables as none of them match and the date format for the opening and closing dates, I have been using "20 Nov 03" format for the British ones but we could easily swap it around for the American one's. What do you think? Gavbadger (talk) 23:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gavbadger(talk)

Sorry about that, I missed the second part of your message. I hadn't put all that much thought into it, I was thinking ordering them by installation size with provincial HQs at the top (i.e.: Khost would be Salerno then other FOBs, Camps, COPs, FBs...) Thoughts? I figure if an alphabetical (or chronological) list is desired, there is always the sort function. Take a gander at my sandbox, if you'd like, and look at Kabul Province, any thoughts on the way the country and forces cols are combined and now link the country flags to the garrisoned forces versus as opposed to two separate columns?

Policy or not, you put in the leg work into making it happen so in a round about way - you can claim it, hopefully I didn't butcher it too bad. On dates, I was trying to go through and use the date tag format in the top of the article edit of MM DD YYYY. As a horrible American, I actually use the British date format, the military ingrained it in me, and since the majority of NATO uses the same (or similar) format I'm totally fine with keeping it MM DD YYYY. VTCofC (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reckon it should be provincial HQ -> Airfield -> Camp -> MOB -> FOB -> COP -> PB -> FB -> Strong Point. I completely agree with Kabul in your sandbox it looks much better. By the date do you mean 11-21-2013 (today) or November, 21 2003? Gavbadger (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC). Edited again (forgot Airfield) Gavbadger (talk) 00:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense to me, except in the cases of sub camps like the ones on Bagram or Pucino on Salerno. Put those right beneath the parent base? I'll slowly get around to changing the flags over and merging the two columns. Re: Dates, I was going by for dates, I was going off the first line in the edit of "Use dmy dates|date=October 2013" and was going dd mmm yyyy ergo... 20 Nov 2013 (today, over here) you're way smarter on the formatting than I so I will defer to you on that one, just let me know what to change em to.VTCofC (talk) 00:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that sounds brilliant re the bases. Ok let's change them to 21 Nov 2013 then, I won't bother changing the dates within the references that only show up in the Reflist though unless it is specifically asked for. Gavbadger (talk) 00:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A reference problem

Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.

Here you added a new reference 10K but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. "Cite error: The named reference REFNAME was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks -- Frze ^{> talk} 11:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ISAF installations in Afghanistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dila District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of ISAF installations in Afghanistan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{| class="wikitable sortable" width="100%"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WWC logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:WWC logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balfour logo.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Balfour logo.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medal of Honor Recipients from Virginia

Category:Medal of Honor Recipients from Virginia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Tech Project Invite

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Virginia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Go Hokies (talk) 00:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, VTCofC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, VTCofC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWC logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]