Jump to content

User talk:VIMMYSEAJATAN/Job Rotation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar
Other comments good job!

--Keronica Grant (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length, but can be a little longer.
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition Good grammar.
Other comments Looks pretty good, good job!

Joselv83 (talk) 17:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length.
Image (needed/appropriate) Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate to text
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good on bullets and bold.
Grammar & composition Good grammar. Small error> Need to switch two words on the third sentence "Work to with" > to work with.
Other comments good job!


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: F.Moshammad
Date of review 5/10/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length, not too short.
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate to textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting
Grammar & composition Good grammar
Other comments Good job!

F.Moshammad (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Mtrowers
Date of review 5/10/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: VIMMYSEAJATAN
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate to textbook information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting Good Formatting
Grammar & composition Nice grammar
Other comments Good work!

Mtrowers (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]