User talk:VHlab

Welcome!

Hello, VHlab, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Unfortunately, the material you used is clearly marked as copyrighted, and is therefore not available for free use. If the university wishes to donate the material, it is welcome to do so by means noted above, or by making the relevant portions of the website available under a compatible copyleft. Acroterion (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, VHlab. You have new messages at Acroterion's talk page.
Message added 22:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Acroterion (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, VHlab. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy, you should consider our guidance on Conflicts of interest and take a look at the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer instead to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you prefer to change your username rather than create a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 15:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VHlab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

CarpeCor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Unaware of Wikipedia username conflict policy during time of username creation. 128.101.136.10 (talk) 21:09, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedual decline; no response to questions below for more than a week; proposed name appears to be taken anyways. Kuru (talk) 22:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you made the unblock request for username change, you made it while logged-out. Please confirm, while logged-in to this account, that the request was made by you. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes I was the one that made the unblock request. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarpeCor (talk • contribs) 15:27, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VHlab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

CarpeCor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was unaware of the conflict of interest username policy. I apologize that I didn't respond to the questions asked previously. Last week I was out of office to help run an academic conference. CarpeCor (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You appear to have already created the new account. Please note that your new account is being held to these standards. This specific account will not be unblocked, and your contributions from your new account may be monitored to ensure policy compliance (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to the questions asked previously: 1) I understand fully it is not a business directory and have no interest in commercial/business promotion on Wikipedia. I am only interested in the dissemination of knowledge and work in a academic setting. 2) I understand conflict of interest and the need for neutral writing and vetting of articles before publishing. I am in no means trying to accomplish what BP is by manipulating Wikipedia. 3) I understand notability. The article I created previously is about something already cited in 2 Wikipedia articles, and numerous news and academic publications per the reference section in that article.

Thank you and I'll be sure to check this page more frequently now that I'm back in office. -Ryan