User talk:V587wiki

Welcome!

Hello, V587wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

October 2015

Hello, I'm BilCat. An edit that you recently made to Template:Infobox aircraft begin/doc seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - BilCat (talk) 06:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Xian WS-15, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please let me know a little. When and where did you take the pictures of J-20? Thanks. Ootsuka02 (talk) 09:25, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Xian Y-20, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at CJ-1000A shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. De728631 (talk) 18:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at WS-20. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 18:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pharaoh of the Wizards. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to ACAE WS-20— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ACAE WS-20 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to ACAE WS-20 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. /wia /talk 03:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Xian Y-20 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. De728631 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]