User talk:Uzairnazki

Tarek Fatah

Please STOP trying to add religion to the infobox on Tarek Fatah the religion parameter has been removed from such infoboxes, so it doesn't work. - Arjayay (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tarek Fatah, you may be blocked from editing.

Religion is not a parameter of the infobox template, so nothing is displayed anyway. So stop adding it, you're wasting everybody's time. Felida97 (talk) 20:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasim Kempson (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references do not appear to be independent. This draft is about what the subject says about himself, and not what others say about him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasim Kempson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wasim Kempson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Uzairnazki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Mehbooba Mufti. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wasim Kempson

Hello, Uzairnazki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Wasim Kempson.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Diver Anderbugh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Diver Anderbugh

Hello, Uzairnazki,

Thanks for creating Diver Anderbugh! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the articles, lolab valley etc

I need your help for improving the articles like lolab valley, sogam lolab. Zeusades 17:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeusades (talk • contribs)