User talk:Ustranimii Uyet

Hello Ustranimii Uyet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Khoi khoi 21:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

But you read what I said. The word of Ustranimii Uyet is not final. More courtesy please. Wikiwoowoo 23:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you are not allowed to keep repeat reverting text just because you disagree with it, even though it is clearly factual!. Wikiwoowoo 23:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Facts are facts. Problems are problems. You may not like them but if it is an accurate fact leave it there. It may be of interest to somebody else other than you. Who cares about shirt suppliers? Other people apart from you obviously. Check Englands page they have a whole section on Kit supplier. This is not about the kit anyway. Its the principle of your approach of removing data because you don't like it. Can't you see that at least two other editors besides myself have reverted your pointless deletions? Doesn't that tell you something? I would like to draw a conclusion to this discussion. Thankyou. Wikiwoowoo 00:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go delete the kit supplier information from the England page then if that is irrelevent too. Wikiwoowoo 00:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

          I deleted the wrong word.  Haven't you ever made a mistake.  Get over it. Wikiwoowoo 17:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said. Get over it. Move on Wikiwoowoo 20:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date links

Could you please not remove the dates from Australia national football (soccer) team - the full date is supposed to be linked, as per MOS:DATE#Dates_containing_a_month_and_a_day -- Chuq 00:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Different, but not better, I can't see a benefit one way or the other. Is there a specific reason you think the full dates aren't suitable for that article? -- Chuq 04:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because they are redundant. There is no need to repeate everywhere that those are 2007 matches, is there?--Ustranimii Uyet 13:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is customary to use full dates on Wikipedia (see the page I linked above). Also, that doesn't explain why you were de-linking "2007" before and changing nothing else? At the moment all the upcoming games are in 2007, but when 2008 dates are announced, it would make more sense just having the one list rather than breaking them up into year - the list is still fairly short. -- Chuq 00:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]