User talk:Usmanj

Welcome!

Hello, Usmanj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Aiza Khan have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 21:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns regarding your edits

Despite my note above you continue to add unsourced personal information to biography articles. Please don't do this. This is especially true with regard to the addition of religion to articles; in order for religion to be included it not only needs to be reliably sourced, you also need to demonstrate self-identification (see for example WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS). Equally concerning is your repeated copyright violations. You've been blocked on Commons for the repeated upload of unfree files and uploaded a blatant copyright violation here on the English Wikipedia (wherein you claimed to have taken the photo yourself, which was obviously a false claim) once you were blocked on Commons. Please ensure you are following the policies linked in this message as further additions of copyright and BLP violations will likely lead to a block of you account.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that as my warnings regarding copyright policy fell on deaf ears and resulted in a fresh batch of blatant copyright violating images being uploaded this morning I've blocked your account indefinitely. Specifically, you are blocked until you are able to demonstrate to an administrator that you understand and will abide by Wikipedia's policies regarding copyright.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]