User talk:Ushtriapopullore

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ushtriapopullore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock this account, so that I may be able to to communicate, via email, with Bbb23, the admin who blocked this account, or any other admin. Ushtriapopullore (talk) 15:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are currently not prevented from using the "email this user" feature. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Two things. First, policy prohibits you from removing declined unblock requests from this page. Second, if you want to request an unblock for the reasons stated in your e-mail to me, you'll need to do so at User talk:Sulmues, the master account. I'm not saying you will be unblocked, but that's your only avenue at this point. Also, I would advise you to skip the fresh start argument as it doesn't apply here.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23, hmmm, thank you, but, no, thank you. You should have responded via the same media that you received my request, so you made a mistake. My best wishes in your personal life! --Ushtriapopullore (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't dictate the rules. I'm willing, within reason, to assist you publicly. I will not respond to your e-mail, and please don't send me any more or I will disable e-mail access.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]