User talk:Userunlimited

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hassan Ali Effendi. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Izhar Haider

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Izhar Haider. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Userunlimited! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 277 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Izhar Haider - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Farhat Hashmi

Hello. Good morning.

Citations to reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources would vastly strengthen the trustworthiness of the edits you want to make. In fact, they are essential. Wikipedia requires them. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE and HERE.

The information you tried to add may (or may not) be true, but it is all unverified. I am removing it according to WP:BURDEN. It should not be added again without verifying it via reliable neutral sources. ... Plus, please don't remove "citation needed" and other templates without resolving the issues they highlight.

Thank you. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Farhat Hashmi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Justice007 (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Farhat Hashmi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Userunlimited, it is probably frustrating to be blocked. I can tell you that administrators don't like doing it. It would be better if editors would respond positively to other editors' advice. Should you return to editing and want to modify the Farhat Hashmi page again, I would be prepared to assist you with the provision of citations, with the clarity of expression, etc, if you'd like that. Please let me know. I do ask you also not to become adversarial. Thank you. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 05:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page name: Dr Farhat Hashmi

Dear User:Userunlimited, I have changed the page title back to its correct title of Farhat Hashmi. Even famous doctors like Christian Barnard are not listed with the title. Please comply with WP:CREDENTIAL. Please desist from editing this page in violation of Wikipedia guidelines. Yours sincerely, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 19:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

User:Userunlimited, you currently again and again appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Farhat Hashmi. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be indefinitely blocked from editing.Justice007 (talk) 11:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aiasha Amir

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aiasha Amir, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Usedtobecool ^✉ ✨ 21:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]