User talk:Usernamealreadyinuse2020
December 2020
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Left-wing politics, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I just want Wikipedia to fully fact check this Honestly because the left wing party has been using people of color like myself and other groups to push their agenda notice how all Blue states have the most poverty democratic run cities do less for people of color then they say and I find it racist to use my ancestors storyline to push their ideas of equality such as affirmative action which I know for a fact MLK would never support due to the fact that it’s based on race Usernamealreadyinuse2020 (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- I actually marched with King and I disagree with you. But in any case you simply can't add your own ideas. See WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. There is no "Wikipedia" to check anything, only editors, and you can't expect others to do your work. And I hate to say this, but your writing is pretty hard to understand. Doug Weller talk 13:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- American political parties today have changed virtually completely in a century and a half. It's pointless to say they haven't and in any case you need to follow our policies at WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 17:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- I actually marched with King and I disagree with you. But in any case you simply can't add your own ideas. See WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. There is no "Wikipedia" to check anything, only editors, and you can't expect others to do your work. And I hate to say this, but your writing is pretty hard to understand. Doug Weller talk 13:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Again that’s prolly why yal ain’t gettin no donations lack of honesty and hella biased Usernamealreadyinuse2020 (talk) 23:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Shit u got the proud boys listed as neo fascists with no proof I mean they leader is black but then gain this site is destined to fail so my work here is done Usernamealreadyinuse2020 (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Joe Biden, you may be blocked from editing. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.