Jump to content

User talk:Username person

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

June 2017

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me from punishment block

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Username person (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a completely unjustified block. Why did you block me when there was no disruption? And why did you accuse me of trolling? No one mentioned on the noticeboard that i cannot ask brad patrick. I just asked him to resign before going for dispute resolution. This is not how you treat people who have been here longer than you son. As this is a punishment block, i should be unblocked. Username person (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You did not ask Brad Patrick. you, with all your Wikipedia experience gained since you created your account on June 5th, demanded that he should give up the tools just as if you had a right to do so. This is not a punishment block; your approach to editing is disruptive. From your earlier comment I suspect that you may have edited as an IP, although we have no way of confirming that. If you have you should have learned what disruptive editing is, and how to address other editors without claiming authority over them. Incidentally, had you bothered to check you would have found that the question of his adminship was discussed about ten years ago, with a community decision that he should keep the tools.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FYI, Username person, you might have a better chance of your appeal falling on more sympathetic ears if you don't call editors 'son', you know? IMHO, etc. Take care. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 15:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "I just asked him to resign before going for dispute resolution." - an explicit and blatant lie. Special:Contributions/Username person shows "Username person" opened an AN thread in which they contributed half a dozen times over an hour (in addition to a talk page & WP:BN notification), and only after support for their perspective was not found on WP:AN did they then post a message on Brad Patrick's talk page demanding his resignation. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Bradbury, a clarification: the account was created in May 2006. Its first edit was on June 5th of this year. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:51, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My error; but my point remains totally valid.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Username_person&oldid=1033914809"