User talk:User1344

Hi. I am making a file here of your disruptive editting to the OPERA neutrino anomaly article to present to administrators with in case your behavior continues.--Anders Feder (talk) 11:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss

Whey don't you respond on Talk:OPERA neutrino anomaly#Amelino/Smolin paper? And please stop calling other users "vandals". --D.H (talk) 16:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one day for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at OPERA neutrino anomaly. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Swarm ^X 16:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Please Discuss

I noticed your post on the AIV boards, sorry but that's obvious a content dispute and not vandalism. I'll repeat the above advice, if you want your material added to the article, you need to discuss it on the article talk page. That's where consensus will be made. Posting trying to get editors who disagree with you blocked isn't going to happen, you need to actually discuss the matter. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 06:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reponse: But, excuse me, why did they delete my contribution in 1st place, without prior discussing? Why they didnt want to discuss their decision before applying? They must restore my contribution first, then discuss the possibility that it should be deleted. I dont want to ban anybody, I want my contribution to be protected from quasi-legal actions. User1344 (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but no, that's not how Wikipedia works. The burden is on the editor who adds the material. By Wikipedia's Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle, when you make an addition to an article and it is reverted, the best thing to do is to start (or join in) a talk page discussion, and try and get other editors to agree with you.

There's a discussion already started [1] about your addition, I would suggest you join in and discuss. Otherwise trying to edit war the material into the article will probably result in another block. Dayewalker (talk) 06:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added my comments there. User1344 (talk) 07:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]