User talk:UrsulaWürthGroup

Welcome!

Hello, UrsulaWürthGroup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Thank you for your message and your advice. I absolutely intend to contribute to Wikipedia in line with all guidelines. I’ve started over with Draft:Robert_Jacobsen_Prize and Talk:Reinhold_Würth and will contribute step by step now. Please let me know if there is anything I should handle differently. Again, thank you--UrsulaWürthGroup (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @CNMall41:, thank you for guidance. As I said, while having a COI, I absolutely intend to contribute as a Wikipedian respecting all the rules. What would I have to do so that the paid contributions tag can be removed, e.g. here Würth? {{Help me}} Could I ask you to undo my changes, if that is okay, and then remove it? Then I will go via the talk pages with my suggestions? Would that work? Thank you for your advice on how to proceed.--UrsulaWürthGroup (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being candid with your disclosure. It goes a long way here. For removal of the tags on any article, I would suggest going to the talk page of each one individually and make whatever requests are necessary to make sure it is written from a WP:NPOV. The reason for the tags is not to be a badge of shame, but to allow other editors to know there may be an issue and to review it for anything that may need cleaned up. If an independent editor can determine there are no issues with NPOV, then the tag can be removed. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Friedmann (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references verify his position with the company but they are not in-depth about the subject. Passing mentions cannot be used to show how someone is notable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Friedmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Friedmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UrsulaWürthGroup! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Jacobsen Prize moved to draftspace

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption: Robert Jacobsen Prize. Paid editors have a conflict of interest, and should therefore create drafts in draftspace and submit them for review. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de:: Thank you. I’ve completed the reworks on the draft to my best knowledge, strictly following a neutral point of view, with major German newspapers and Public Broadcasting as sources plus in-depth book about the prize. Please note that I have a conflict of interest as I am working in the communications department of Würth. Could you possibly review my suggestions as an uninvolved editor and make changes if you find them appropriate? Again, thank you --UrsulaWürthGroup (talk) 13:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Jacobsen Prize (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing seems to cover the recipients and not be about the prize. Maybe merge to the artist's article if sourcing baout the prize itself can't be found?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Jacobsen Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Jacobsen Prize, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 19:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Star Mississippi. I'll do so. UrsulaWürthGroup (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Friedmann

Hello, UrsulaWürthGroup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Friedmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Jacobsen Prize

Hello, UrsulaWürthGroup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Jacobsen Prize, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Jacobsen Prize

Hello, UrsulaWürthGroup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert Jacobsen Prize".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Friedmann

Hello, UrsulaWürthGroup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert Friedmann".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]