User talk:Urpunkt
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Urpunkt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Anna Lincoln 12:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Glenn Beck
[edit]I've added a link to the official video if you need proof of the quote. Do you have any reason to believe the quote on the program is unreliable? Why would you doubt the accuracy of this quote? Bachcell (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- "Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight. Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist" to my mind, this seems a fairly apt description of Mr Beck and his programme. I appreciate you may not agree, but what is presented as a quote here may well not be. It certainly doesn't sound like one. I can't find a transcript of the speech anywhere on the internet, nor this phrase. If we had that, that would be an interesting external link. In itself the fact that Fritz Kuhn was mentioned on a TV show recently is not notable, there have been many shows made concerning right-extremism in the USA. Have you considered calling/emailing the show and asking for the transcript? If this is not a direct quote from Kuhn himself (and there really is no reason to believe that it is) it has no place in the article.
Urpunkt☎ 03:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for tracking down the original address, that's truly precious. If you have time, it would be good to include more excerpts from this program into both the Kuhn and Bund articles. To be truly NPOV, links to websites of questionable taste (i.e. sympathetic to the Bund) should be included to recognize that even today the Bund may have supporters, no matter how wildly politically incorrect they may be. Bachcell (talk) 03:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]Hi Urpunkt!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:50, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Urpunkt! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
[edit]| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Urpunkt! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Image
[edit]File:Bsa-religion-question.svg lists you as one of the contributors. Could you create a similar image based on [1]? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Otto Buchwitz
[edit]Do you think that you could finish the translation and move the article to mainspace?Naraht (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Urpunkt/Otto Buchwitz
[edit]
User:Urpunkt/Otto Buchwitz, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Urpunkt/Otto Buchwitz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Urpunkt/Otto Buchwitz during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- the result was to blank the page, if you ever want to revive it, feel free to do so; though I suggest you do a new translation and then ask for the history merge at WP:RFPI. — xaosflux Talk 02:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
The file File:ToL Progress.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
