User talk:Urchu
Welcome!
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
[edit]Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Kautilya3 (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Page moves
[edit]Your move of 1971 Bangladesh genocide was contentious and disruptive. For moving any page to a new title, you must follow the guidelines at WP:MOVE. You have now been informed of the ARBIPA sanctions. If you do this again, you will be liable to get sanctioned. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Page move
[edit]Your move of Indonesian killings of 1965-1966 show no sign of conversation or request for comment first about the move:
And as a consequence your move, despite your edit summaries : This name is more specific and makes it sound like a single cohesive event rather than "killings" which is vague and sounds like it could be refer to multi...
is something that requires other editors to reach a consensus as to whether your assertion can be agreed with. Until then please do not edit that again, thank you.
Note also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves#CM JarrahTree 08:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Genocides in history. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
reminder
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_moves#CM - you are continually moving pages on your own accord against controversial subjects (edit summaries are not conversations on talk pages), if you are not interested in staying on wikipedia very long, you are going the way of being sanctioned. cheers
not referring to the cambodian killing fields move, that seems obvious, but ...
in fact 'killing fields' should become a WP:REDIRECT, so that the different ones can be discerned... JarrahTree 00:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Genocides in history, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Wario-Man. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hazaras without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wario-Man (talk) 11:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Khmer Rouge Killing Fields.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop unexplained removal of reliably sourced content and renaming/moving pages without prior discussion and WP:CONSENSUS. JimRenge (talk) 13:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Genocides in history. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-consensus moves
[edit]Your account was created on November 2. Since then you have made a huge number of moves with no discussion, many of them about notorious massacres. The steps of WP:RM#CM are open to you. The next time you make a controversial move with no discussion you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Login
[edit]Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Khmer Rouge Killing Fields while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Disruptive article moves
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. WIth this move you have continued your large-scale campaign of massacre-related page moves for which you make no attempt at discussion. See my above warning. EdJohnston (talk) 14:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 27 November
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Political cleansing of population page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Political cleansing of population.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Copy/paste 'moves'
[edit]You should not copy and paste large sections of one article into another article, doing so causes attribution issues which ultimately require administrator attention and the deletion of those revisions of the page(s) which contain copied text lacking attribution. The correct process is to discuss and then request a history merge where two articles need to be combined into one. Nick (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Account reblocked
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)- You were previously blocked for making undiscussed contentious page moves. When the block expired you created multiple new accounts to continue making the same contentious edits contrary to our policies regarding multiple accounts.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
POV sockpuppetry December 2016
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC) @Ponyo:Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)"Hmong genocide" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hmong genocide. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 13#Hmong genocide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. (t · c) buidhe 20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)