User talk:Universelike

Uranarse, you were not supposed to replace the template I removed. The template says: "If this template is removed, do not replace it." And you should discuss your changes on the Talk page first. Israell (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you read? "You may remove this message if you improve the article OR otherwise object to deletion for any reason." Israell (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Israell, you did not follow the instructions you have posted. You did not improve the article or object. You seem to have used the subject's website to migrate the information here. You have not used neutral sources nor has any outside proof verified that this person is notable in the fields claimed. I am reporting you for edit warring. Uranarse (talk) 17:19, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion (prod) can not be restored once challenged. Please do not re-add it again. If you want the article deleted, it has to go through articles for deletion. If you restore the prod again, I'll have to block you to stop the disruption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate:, see... They do not seem to understand what "otherwise object to deletion for any reason" means. I have repeatedly explained to them that I had a choice: "you may remove this message if you improve the article" or "otherwise object to deletion for any reason", but they really do not seem to understand what "otherwise object to deletion for any reason" (I did object to deletion and explained why). Either that or they're being of bad faith and pretending they do not understand. And now, they're falsely accusing me of edit warring when they are the one that repeatedly removed that challenged template. Israell (talk) 18:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Uranarse (talk) 17:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Uranarse, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, appear to represent a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. However, you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but your username is too similar to "you are an arse". Please either create a new account or request that this account be renamed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Universelike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Uranus979 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

You might have gotten away with that had it been your initial choice, but your current username makes it clear the choice is meant to be inappropriate. Please take this seriously and choose a proper username. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(eyeroll) Cute, but no. This looks like a puerile attempt to circumvent the block and keep the anal ref. ANy other renamer can proceed as they see fit, but I will require no anatomic references or word play. Yes, we are all children at some part of our lives. I didn't think this particular pun was funny when I was 14. Even less so now.-- Deep fried okra 18:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now you are the one being immature here for denying a name change. I have used this name for over a decade and didn't see it an offensive towards anyone nor is it directed at anyone. I can see no one cares about these fake bios that pretend to to be fact-checked by adding references that don't support their info. Clearly Isreall is here promoting someone as opposed to being a neutral editor. Tsk! Tsk! {{unblock-un|Saturn979}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Universelike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Abuse of power caused this block

Decline reason:

Clearly not. As you are continuing to troll, I have revoked your talk page access. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry Investigation

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jude1313. Thank you. Israell (talk) 20:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note to future admins – this is a soft block

This is a soft username block, so the user should not be blocked for sock puppetry after creating a new account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]