User talk:Untilwhen1

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Iron pillar of Delhi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.The Seeker 4 Talk 13:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your statement on my talk page, this edit was yours, and is the edit I am referring to above. The Seeker 4 Talk 12:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Re: Shorten it!!

There is no need to shorten it. All the info in the section is well substantiated by credible sources. I have reverted your edit, as your reason for removing the statement is not an appropriate one and indeed, makes no sense. You have provided no appropriate reason for the removal of info, other than WP:IDONTLIKEIT and your opinion that these are propaganda, for which you have provided no adequate proof. You are obviously a biased POV oriented person and i am not going to let you censor articles in wikipedia, simply because you find these info distasteful. If you feel that there is some problem with the section, then bring it up in the article's talk page. Engage in a discussion, instead of recklessly deleting well sourced info. Such edits constitute vandalism. One more thing! Better watch your bloody language in your discourse with me the next time. Any more personal attacks will render you liable to getting blocked. Understand? Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 05:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol. OK. I'm calling you out on your bluff. If you can, prove that these sources are unreliable on the article's talk page. Let's see how many users agree with you. If you manage to do that, i will delete this whole section myself. Until then, the section will remain. I'm giving you a chance to embarrass yourself. Don't miss this. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 06:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you are going to receive for your disruptive edits to Tippu Sultan. The statement that you keep removing again and again is sourced by the Daijiworld link. The entire para is sourced. As a reputed news agency, Daijiworld's credibility is not in question. If you vandalize the article again, then you will get blocked. Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me} 01:19, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Your continued disruptive editing (removing of valid content, incivil comments on talk-pages, etc.) is not acceptable behavior on Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Ethnic cleansing, you will be blocked from editing. Your edit removed some cited text. I checked the reference and it did say 'murdered', which is what you removed. Please don't do this. Dougweller (talk) 21:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tipu Sultan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Nayvik (talk) 08:22, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]