User talk:Unst
Appearance
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit] Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rubric (company).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kanuk (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- There is nothing in the content that demonstrates the notability of this company. There are millions of corporate entities in the world. What is special about this business. Are there some articles from reputable publications that do more than repeat corporate brochures. Has anyone written an independent article about this business that demonstrates why it has done something that is notable. The Wikipedia is not a forum for creating a corporate profile or promoting a corporate business. It is up to you if you, if you can find something substantial I would look at it again. There is a fundamental question, is this a notable organization. The wikipedia is not the telephone yellow pages, not an advertizing forum. The sentence about the meaning of Rubric takes up half the article and is of no consequence other than a piece of trivia. Someone can look up rubric in the dictionary or on wiki dictionary. Kanuk (talk) 22:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)