User talk:Unniyarcha

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chandu Chekaver has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chandu Chekaver was changed by Unniyarcha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864742 on 2017-03-07T06:59:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aromal Chekaver. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Aromal Chekaver was changed by Unniyarcha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869357 on 2017-03-07T07:00:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Unniyarcha, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Unniyarcha was changed by Unniyarcha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898811 on 2017-03-07T07:00:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unniyarcha, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Unniyarcha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

August 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nambiar (Nair subcaste), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manalar (Nair caste)

The article Manalar (Nair caste) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. The sole source does not even mention this alleged Nair subgroup, so even a redirect to Nair will not work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

I see you have already had a recent warning concerning issues of sourcing yet you have now edited the Ezhava article to include information that is also not in the sources. You've also created the pretty hopeless Manalar article for which you have just received a PROD notice, and I have a memory that you were disruptive in similar ways some years ago. For these reasons, I think you need to be aware of the following information. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 06:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Proposed deletion of Malayala Shudra (Nair)

The article Malayala Shudra (Nair) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. The sole cited source makes no mention of this alleged subcaste so we cannot even redirect to the Nair article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ezhava. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Aside from yet again having to remove something you added to Ezhava which was not in the source, it turns out that I and others have had to revert every edits you have made in the last couple of days. Please familiarise yourself with the information given at WP:V. Sitush (talk) 06:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ezhava shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. regentspark (comment) 16:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

POV fork

Having already been told that there is a long history of claims about the alleged separate identities of Ezhava and Thiyya, and that it is dealt with in the Ezhava article, why did you think creating Thiyya (sub caste) today was a good idea? It is a WP:POVFORK and I have redirected it, as with so many attempts by previous contributors to create similar forks. Some of those prior titles were, in fact, protected to prevent further hijacking by people unwilling to abide by our policies and guidelines: they mostly ended up being blocked and you're going to meet the same fate unless you changes your ways sharpish, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then please explain why did Nambiar, Menon have separate Wikipedia? Why don't thiyyar

Because they are considered to be notable subcastes, whereas Thiyya is a synonym according to reliable sources. Also, the gist of WP:OSE has some relevance. You've just made another change based on your original research - here - and so I really do feel it is time for some admin attention. Pinging Bishonen. - Sitush (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sitush bro from 2012 onwards we are fighting for our Wikipedia back. Thiyyar is not synonymous, in 10th class sslc book it is written as thiyya for Malabar thiyya. But for a Menon and Nambiar it is Nair caste only in sslc book. Bro you are a great admin having enormous privileges. Why we don't deserve our page back, thiyya is notable.. Maybe we are lower caste people than Nair, Nambiar and Menon, but we need our page back bro. Please help... More than 10 years we are saying in Wikipedia. Please help

Firstly, I am not an administrator. Secondly, as I suggested yesterday on my talk page, I think you are operating as part of a long-running farm of sock- and meatpuppets. Your latest post on my talk page seems to confirm the latter, and previously, over several years, there have been sockpuppets detected who were trying to achieve the same purpose. It isn't acceptable behaviour, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 05:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sock puppets, we are real people from Thiyya community. Please help sir

Blocked

After reviewing your contributions, I have blocked you indefinitely for not being here to improve Wikipedia, but only to promote your own caste, and violating our rules in doing it. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 07:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]