User talk:Unlikelyheroine

Welcome!

Hello, Unlikelyheroine, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Scientizzle 01:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George Courtney

Hi - thanks for contributing recently to the George Courtney page. However, the information you included is not relevant to the notability of the subject. It could also possibly cause distress due to its nature and the timing of its inclusion, and has been removed. Thanks. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 00:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand if you think it's not relevant to the subject, but as for the timing, that is what it is. If a person featured on Wikipedia dies then I think it gets mentioned, sensitivity concerns or not. Unlikelyheroine 23:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thanks for your post at the George Courtney talk page.

I am a little concerned at your heavy inclination toward the word "reporting". This is an encyclopedia, not an up-to-the-minute daily newspaper where we all get to display the latest info on our chosen subjects, in all their glory.

We are not "reporting" anything. We are giving readers a grounding in the subject they have accessed, by carefully and (I maintain) tactfully examining facts as supported by sources, and then adding to the article if (and when) appropriate. If you would like to enter the world of news reporting, I would suggest opening an account at Wikinews.

In actual fact, I believe that Matthew's passing is now perhaps less sensitive to the Courtney family than it was - after all, my concern was essentially the timing of the addition of information and its relevance to his notability, not whether it was actually encyclopedic in nature.

Anything which supports George's notability is naturally added immediately - reportagé on secondary issues connected to him are not so urgent, and I say there is room for compassion and tact where the latter is concerned. Otherwise show me the guideline which prohibits this.

I would not now object if you went back and added the info about his son, given the passage of time. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 20:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to PIG LIKE IN APPEARANCE DO YOU LIEK THE VIDYA GAEM, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Do not create pages like this. ~ Wikihermit 03:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was nearly two months ago. Also, you will need to contact an admin as the page is deleted. ~ Wikihermit 02:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unlikelyheroine, I'm an admin. Wikihermit didn't mean to insult you, but it had appeared at the time that you had created an article with such an insane title because someone moved the page to a different title, and it was not immediately apparent that you had not created the article at that location. Because, as an admin, I can view deleted revisions, I let Wikihermit know what he needed to (he asked me to take a look at this case), so the honest mistake warning you for creation of a page with a ridiculous title won't be held against you. :) Hope that helps, Nihiltres^(t.l) 02:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to have it sorted out :-). Happy editing! ~ Wikihermit 02:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shebah Ronay

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Shebah Ronay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 19:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Summary in Olivia Spencer and Natalia Rivera Aitoro

I removed the detailed summary that you inserted into the Olivia Spencer and Natalia Rivera Aitoro article. To conform to the WP:PLOTSUM guidelines a plot summary should be a relatively short and concise summary. I wrote a short plot summary for the current state of Olivia and Natalia's relationship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loveoandn (talk • contribs) 01:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Unlikelyheroine! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Julia Foster - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unlikelyheroine. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Unlikelyheroine. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unlikelyheroine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]