User talk:Unknowndudeonwiki
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Unknowndudeonwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 10:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. Liz Read! Talk! 10:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2024 Indian Premier League Points table, you may be blocked from editing. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 07:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- What did I vandalize? If it was for not giving an edit summary, I apologise but I don't think I made inaccurate changes. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 08:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's unexplained removal of content; LSG is eliminated. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 09:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- They could qualify if they win by a huge margin today and the result of the RCB vs CSK match goes their way. I know it's very improbable but this is an encyclopedia and we aren't supposed to predict future events. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- We made no predictions, Cricbuzz stated it. Still, It's not possible for LSG to finish with the higher net run rate. All they can get now is 6th or 7th place. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- They could qualify if they win by 700 runs, for example. ESPNcricinfo and NDTV Sports say it's possible if miracles happen. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not even the best cricketers ever could do that in a T20 match. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know, but this is technically a prediction. I don't want to edit war, so let's finish arguing. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- No predictions allowed here; Only mathematical possibilities. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what. There is a possibility. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, mathematically highest possible score for a T20 is around 350–400 runs. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 720! Kew word: Mathematically. Maybe even more if they bowl wides and no-balls, but at least 720. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's not for us to decide. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- MATHEMATICALLY! What do you mean by we can't decide? Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- We only add what the reliable sources say such as ESPNcricinfo, Cricbuzz etc. per WP:ORIGINAL Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- And what does ESPNcricinfo say? Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing about this; only one source is enough when no conflicts are there. You can see it in the main article. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Read this. I know it was published before yesterday's match was washed out, but there's still one place up for grabs. You were the first person who used the word "mathematically" but you're not thinking that way. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- A quote from your source: "like DC, LSG are out of the race too," Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Literally next words: "barring several miraculous results.". Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is if SRH lost yesterday. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 14:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just think I should wait until this match ends because we won't agree. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maby we should just let other prominent editors decide. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 14:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- The match will end very soon, so I don't care. But I think this should be resolved! Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Maby we should just let other prominent editors decide. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 14:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just think I should wait until this match ends because we won't agree. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is if SRH lost yesterday. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 14:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Literally next words: "barring several miraculous results.". Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- A quote from your source: "like DC, LSG are out of the race too," Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Read this. I know it was published before yesterday's match was washed out, but there's still one place up for grabs. You were the first person who used the word "mathematically" but you're not thinking that way. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing about this; only one source is enough when no conflicts are there. You can see it in the main article. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- And what does ESPNcricinfo say? Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- We only add what the reliable sources say such as ESPNcricinfo, Cricbuzz etc. per WP:ORIGINAL Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- MATHEMATICALLY! What do you mean by we can't decide? Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's not for us to decide. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 13:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- 720! Kew word: Mathematically. Maybe even more if they bowl wides and no-balls, but at least 720. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, mathematically highest possible score for a T20 is around 350–400 runs. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what. There is a possibility. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- No predictions allowed here; Only mathematical possibilities. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know, but this is technically a prediction. I don't want to edit war, so let's finish arguing. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not even the best cricketers ever could do that in a T20 match. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- They could qualify if they win by 700 runs, for example. ESPNcricinfo and NDTV Sports say it's possible if miracles happen. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- We made no predictions, Cricbuzz stated it. Still, It's not possible for LSG to finish with the higher net run rate. All they can get now is 6th or 7th place. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 12:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- They could qualify if they win by a huge margin today and the result of the RCB vs CSK match goes their way. I know it's very improbable but this is an encyclopedia and we aren't supposed to predict future events. Unknowndudeonwiki (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's unexplained removal of content; LSG is eliminated. Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 09:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! Unknowndudeonwiki,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 10:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
|
May 2024
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Concern regarding Draft:Oliver Dean
[edit]Hello, Unknowndudeonwiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oliver Dean, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)