User talk:Unknownbroadway

Add "citation" using the "rev" tab. Don't forget to sign you comments with "Unknownbroadway (talk) 09:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)" at the end like it says above. Keep it short and simple. Mostly, clean though.[reply]

File source problem with File:Thackray jackson.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Thackray jackson.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nitin Gadkari

I have re added the References required tag to Nitin Gadkari. Despite your good work adding citations and removing POV language, large portions of the article still remains unsourced or without inline citations. Ideally the tag should be removed after everything is cited. --Sodabottle (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a herculian task to weed out POV's and correct grammeritical errors and add citations. It might take me 2-3 days to compete it and if by any chance i manage to delete any tag's then please add them back. No need to ping me about it. The article will look complete when it's complete till then the tags remain i suppose.Unknownbroadway (talk)

Message for you on Talk:Nitin_Gadkari#Yogita_Thakre_Death. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Arundhati Roy, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 15:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Arundhati Roy. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 19:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arundhati Roy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -SpacemanSpiff 08:38, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arundhati Roy

in general, if you boldly add material to a page and it is reverted, you need to get consensus on the talk page of the article BEFORE you re-add the material. If consensus for your material is not forthcoming, you can seek other methods of dispute resolution, including a third opinion or a request for comment. However, if you keep reinserting your material without consensus, you will be blocked for edit warring. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 14:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say so? Unknownbroadway (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unknownbroadway, I'll second the advice RegentsPark gave to you above. Establish consensus on talk page through discussion instead of repeatedly making disputed edits to the article. You currently seem to be engaged in a slow edit war which is both an ineffective and disruptive technique, for which you are liable to be blocked if you continue. Abecedare (talk) 22:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Provide me the wiki rules where it says that consensus is required to edit an article and i'll willingly follow them. Keep the threats to yourself. Regards Unknownbroadway (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's common sense and to avoid edit wars. Successfull collaboration requires some consent. WP is no news group of discussion forum where everybody simply writes individually whatever they want. WP guidelines regarding those issues can be found here among others: Wikipedia:Editing policy. Regards --Kmhkmh (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the rules and i do not see any problems. Im expanding the info box again. Unknownbroadway (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shiv Sena.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Shiv Sena.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Hekerui (talk) 13:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. —SpacemanSpiff 07:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SHIVSENA symbol.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:SHIVSENA symbol.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SHIVSENA symbol.jpg

The file File:SHIVSENA symbol.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SHIVSENA symbol.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SHIVSENA symbol.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]