User talk:Unitvm

Intelligent design

You added a boiler to this article, suggesting that its content is currently under heavy discussion. How is it? Where is it? The only real discussion on the Talk page was concluded today when ArrrghBob, the editor who wanted to change the article promised to "discontinue this campaign to change the first sentence of the second paragraph". there is no other currently heated discussion. -- Ec5618 21:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've added a unexplained tag to the intelligent design article. The rules outlined in Wikipedia:NPOV dispute specify that you must explain your reasons in the talk page. Please do so.--Roland Deschain 21:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have added another template to this article. This time, you added a template that is to be used exclusively in other templates. Will you please discuss what you're doing? Forcing us to reverse your actions is hardly productive. -- Ec5618 22:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protonotary apostolic

And now you've added a boiler to this article, suggesting its title is incorrectly formatted. Please stop. These edits could be considered vandalism, which may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Ec5618 22:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

I tagged "Vatican Diplomatic Corps" as a copyvio. The article was lifted verbatim from the Vatican website. Jim62sch 10:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geneva Conventions

You added a protected boiler to this article. You are not allowed, nor able, to protect articles. Please stop placing biolers, unless you are clear on their function. -- Ec5618 22:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Matt Petgrave

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matt Petgrave, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Matt Petgrave

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matt Petgrave, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

blah blah blah

CS1 error on Matt Petgrave

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matt Petgrave, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Matt Petgrave. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. stwalkerster (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]