User talk:Unique Albay
Dear one,
I am an avid user and contributor to Wikipedia. I may want this message to you straightforward for I have to sleep now. Thank You for your persistent contributions against Dominic McArthur, for that user has also bothered me for a long time, very long time. May I request your continued pertinence against him and his allies if there are any, for he is a certified vandalizer. He vandalizes every wikipedia page in connection to Legazpi, Albay. I am proud to say, you did stood up against that user, for no one would act seriously against him.
May then I request that you make your edits, not too striking enough. What I mean is, do not quickly add mass content, for the article, and the readers must adjust thoroughly the amount of the content of the article. And, do not add advertisement-like acclamations, just make it all plain and simple, and understandable. Do not add much amount, for it only takes the credibility of wikipedia away from it.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Dear Jacob Frostwhinner,
I have very little idea how my posts suddenly became "promotional" in nature. In my point of view, as a resident of Bicol, the statements I have included are all true. Let it be noted that not all POVs are necessarily untrue. The POV of a resident must be accorded with such great respect as he is but a witness to practically all events that are happening in his community! Let it be noted too, that looking for sources is extremely difficult to do but, still, I promise to provide them as soon as I have time. Thank you for your support.Unique Albay (talk) 05:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Naga, Camarines Sur. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear User: Blakegripling ph, I have not made editions in the past three days on that page and have only made one edition so far.Unique Albay (talk) 02:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
User: Blakegripling ph, please check the edit history of that page. What I have done could hardly be considered as edit warring. Thank you.Unique Albay (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Administrator's Noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute and incivil behavior on Naga, Camarines Sur and Legazpi, Albay. Thank you. -- Tito Pao (talk) 06:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Theorientalhotelgovernorssuite.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Theorientalhotelgovernorssuite.jpg, which you've attributed to The Oriental Legazpi. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Legazpi City Aerial View.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Legazpi City Aerial View.jpg, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 60 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
