User talk:Unified star
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Unified star, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Unified star, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Unified star! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Surendra Bahadur Hamal has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
KylieTastic (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 split in the Nepalese communist parties has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 12:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Thanks Mr. Bada Kaji Unified star (talk) 12:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 03:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
Unblock request!
[edit]
Unified star (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What is ment by Sock poppet? I am not a sock poppet. How do you confirm this? Please unblock me. I have contributed productively on Wikipedia. Is this due to same reason? Unified star (talk) 03:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed sock puppet. Also, given the threats and lies, your talk page access is revoked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Even if I have made a mistake, please help me correct it. I love making articles on current political issues as I am a online journalist. I padon for any mistake made but request for an unblock. Unified star (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
What is the problem?
[edit]@Usedtobecool, I am not a sock poppet! Brother, contribute productively and let others contribute as well. I am totally positive. Were my edits destructive? Were they? You feel your profile is secret here but till when? Your conflict of interest is evident. I had made some productive changes and had published notable articles! I found written someone curious....'s sock! Who's that persona? How come you prove that I am his sock? I am not! In certain areas, people's interest match. This doesn't mean they are same. I saw their IP. It's from Kathmandu and Vianet communications. I am a computer engineering student. I know those tools. Please investigate. With a clean mind, please revive my articles which have been deleted else I will take actions and it won't be any good for you if I will prove. Do correct and let others correct! Last time, You are not doing any good.Unified star (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
See this edit of mine.[1], and see this [2]. His and my edits are totally different. I don't see any sports related edit from that person. See mine![3], [4]. I am also a part-time online sports journalist. Please I request you to revert whatever happened due to you! Keep in mind this is not a warning. And even if it is, you deserve getting warned for accepting only your dirty part of mind. Unified star (talk) 04:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
You found me editing related to Nepali Congress, right! Do you read any newspaper, listen to radio or watch a TV? Isn't the news full of NC? Can you deny this? Who writes the news? Me? There are thousands of journalists, bloggers and intelligent people who write about Nepali Congress, their ministers, MPs and MLAs daily. Only you are dirty minded. If I am not unblocked, I will bring whole of this matter out. I saw written things of my talk page reverted but note even it gets reverted, I get evidence anyday I like. Do accordingly! Please be positive and think productive. Do correct and let others do correct.Unified star (talk) 04:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
@Fade258, Bada Kaji, KylieTastic you three had helped me publish and improve my articles which has been deleted now. Please help proving me correct. Weren't those articles productive/notable?This person named cool is having one sided revenge with me.Unified star (talk) 04:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- I know many of your edits are good, maybe even most. That is why I've never reverted your edits blindly. That is why I tried to help you. That is why I helped you to get unblocked; I even offered to mentor you. But you never had any intention of making any effort to fix your weaknesses, did you? And they are a deal breaker.You made more than 200 edits and half a dozen articles while I was away for less than two days. Obviously, I can't check all your edits to see if they are neutral or just promoting your favourite leaders of your favourite party, or worse attacking rivals. I thought I might offer you advice on a potential way back into the community when I got your ping, but reading the above, the gist I take from it is that I should fear for my safety if there were even a small chance I slipped up about my real-world identity in my 25,000 edits over 3 years. Seeing as this is a community project for the believers of the sanctity of knowledge
and definitely not one of ignorant goons of corrupt political organisations, I don't think there is a way for you to be accepted back here anytime soon. So long! Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)- There is always the standard offer. You have clearly shown that you are capable of writing good articles. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 10:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)