User talk:UnhappyCanuck

UnhappyCanuck, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi UnhappyCanuck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Paragraphs

Hi Unhappy, I noticed that you recently went through several articles and split up the paragraphs into much smaller ones. This really isn't necessary, as the paragraphs were not overly long to begin with, and many of the resulting ones were too short (some only a sentence or two long). These are all featured articles, that have been reviewed, so I'd just caution article-wide changes without talk page discussion. If like, I can point you to some of Wikipedia's policies on article format and style (e.g. WP:MOS). Ergo Sum 18:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi UnhappyCanuck! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Ergo Sum 19:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad girl movies

I left you a message on Talk:Bad girl movies last week, and I've now proposed that the page be redirected to Film noir. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion. pburka (talk) 20:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look closely?

Your edit to Theodore Maiman split a sentence into two parts, across two paragraphs, leaving a very strange result:

In a July 7, 1960 press conference in Manhattan,

Maiman and his employer, Hughes Aircraft Company, announced the laser to the world.

Check your work with care. Shenme (talk) 03:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ginny Simms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Angry edit reason

Hi there, I can see you're new to Wikipedia, but you should know that this edit reason was unnecessarily combative, which is generally not a good way to get on with other editors. I can encourage you to read WP:AGF, as well. If you want to discuss the year further, you can start a new section at the article talk page. Kingsif (talk) 04:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to George Floyd protests does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Love of Corey (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraphs part 2

Re: these changes, I have to echo the comments that Ergo Sum left on your talk page in May 2020. The paragraph breaks you added to the Christopher Dorner article seem totally arbitrary, as if you're breaking them because the page markup is too dense, rather than because the content in each paragraph is too dense. Your changes seem really excessive and in some cases, the content reads like a middle-school essay, with one statement, paragraph break, two statements, paragraph break, etc. Though some of your contributions to this page were constructive, I've reverted these paragraph breaks, because I don't feel they meet normal English writing standards. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It is not helpful to split paragraphs into stubby little paragraphs. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Encyclopedia readers can read a reasonable-length paragraph, as long as the paragraphs present the material in a logical way. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Huizenga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gone Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LaDonna Brave Bull Allard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Cristal

Her article and all refs still say 89, not 86. Please post a firm reliable reference for your claim if re-entering it at Deaths in 2020. Until then we go with the article and current source. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 00:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I only saw 1934 but I see now that some sources are citing 1931 as her year of birth. Thanks UnhappyCanuck (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]